Glaucoma - Summary of a Unique Strategy to Treat Glaucoma

The maintenance of intraocular pressure (IOP) within a narrow range is essential for the proper functioning of intraocular tissues that facilitate vision. Uncontrolled intraocular pressure, or ocular hypertension, is the primary risk factor for developing primary open-angle glaucoma, a blinding disease which accounts for ~90% of all glaucoma cases. IOP generation is a function of the balance of fluid entering the eye via active secretion by the ciliary epithelium (aqueous inflow) and removal by two outflow pathways. The conventional outflow pathway accounts for the majority of fluid removal and the uveoscleral outflow pathway is responsible for the remainder. The pathology responsible for ocular hypertension in the majority of primary open-angle glaucoma cases occurs in the conventional pathway.

Controlling IOP in glaucoma patients, whether or not they have ocular hypertension, is important because results from several clinical trials demonstrate that significant, sustained intraocular pressure reduction in people with glaucoma slows or halts vision loss due to damage/death of retinal ganglion cells in the retina. The finding of new and more effective way to control IOP (and avoid laser treatment or surgery) is an important step for treatment of many glaucoma patients who no longer respond to available drugs. Therefore, the patent application by Drs. Stamer and Heimark represents a novel targeted therapy that has not been identified in the ophthalmology literature until their recent publication (Heimark, Kaocher & Stamer 2002).

Interestingly, available pharmaceuticals that target the diseased tissuethe conventional drainage pathway, are not used to control IOP in the long term due to unpleasant side effects. This is unfortunate because the conventional pathway is the pressure-sensitive pathway and responsible for 70-90% of total drainage of aqueous humor. Instead, first-line treatments utilize pharmaceutical agents that lower IOP by targeting aqueous secretion and/or uveoscleral outflow; ocular functions not directly responsible for elevated IOP in glaucoma. In fact, treatment with such current modalities decrease perfusion of conventional outflow tissues (either by decreasing pressure gradient that drives flow through the conventional pathway or by shunting aqueous humor away) and are thought to accelerate pathological processes. Thus, developing a drug (such as the one proposed in our current patent application) that targets the diseased tissue in POAG, the conventional outflow pathway, is critical for better long term outcomes.

The conventional outflow tissue is unique in its architecture and composed of the trabecular meshwork and Schlemm’s canal. Structurally, the trabecular meshwork is a latticework of extracellular matrix biopolymers that are covered by trabecular endothelial-like cells and are situated at the iridocorneal angle of the anterior chamber of the eye (the angle formed by the iris and cornea).

The cells of the trabecular meshwork maintain the configuration of the trabecular lamellae, the turnover of ground substances, and the patency of the trabecular passages through which aqueous humor travels (figure, arrows) into Schlemm’s canal, a continuous endothelial-lined channel that drains aqueous humor from the eye interior into the general venous circulation.

Thus, natural flow patterns will direct therapeutics to Schlemm’s canal. The walls of Schlemm’s canal provide the only continuous cellular barrier for intraocular fluid on its way out of the eye. Cell-cell junctional complexes between Schlemm’s canal cells maintain the barrier and regulate the paracellular movement of intraocular fluid. The patent by Stamer and Heimark is the first to propose the modulation of this cellular barrier as a means to control IOP.

Interestingly, while Schlemm’s canal endothelium is morphologically similar to non-fenestrated tight endothelium, the direction of fluid movement across the endothelial cells that form Schlemm’s canal is unique, in the basal to apical direction (opposite of vascular endothelium). Thus, the control of fluid flow across this unique endothelial cells layer provides a novel drug target for therapeutic development. In contrast, modulation of a similar target in vascular endothelium is not physiologically beneficial because it results in the leakage of blood into the interstitial space. In these experiments using intravenous administration of anti-cadherin-5 IgG, vasculature in the eye (including Schlemm’s canal) was not affected because of ocular immune privilege and because of the relationship of Schlemm’s canal with venous drainage of the eye. A recent review article by our group uncovers the unique biology of Schlemm’s canal endothelia compared to other endothelia (Ramos, Hoying, Witte and Stamer, 2007).

New Preliminary Data in Supports VE-cadherin as a Novel Drug Target for Glaucoma and Addressed Concerns of Previous Patent Review

Human SC endothelial cells express VE-cadherin as well as other endothelial markers. Since intraocular pressure is related to the resistance of the movement of aqueous humor across Schlemm’s Canal, we began studies to characterize the cell-cell junctions of cells that form the inner wall of Schlemm’s canal.

Previously we had shown in fresh frozen sections of the human outflow pathway that Schlemm’s canal endothelial cells expressed PECAM1 and VE-cadherin, while cells of the trabecular meshwork did not. Further characterization here (figure 1) shows that Human Schlemm’s Canal endothelial cells isolated from non-glaucomatous cadaveric eyes (SC42, SC44) express adherens junction proteins: VE-cadherin, N-cadherin, β-catenin and p120-catenin, similar to endothelial cell controls (HMEC1). Messenger RNA corresponding to the tight junction proteins: junctional adhesion proteins 1, 2 and 3 (JAM1, JAM2, JAM3), ZO-1, occludin and claudin 4 and claudin 5 were examined.

Claudin 5 was limited to vascular endothelial cells and SC cells, while claudin 4 was expressed in all of the cell types. These studies, shown in figure 1, confirm that VE-cadherin is only expressed in Schelmm’s canal endothelial cells and not in Trabecular meshwork cells. Overall, the profile of intercellular junction genes in Schlemm’s canal is very similar to that of vascular endothelial cells.

While Schlemm’s canal endothelial (SCE) cells express many of the same proteins as endothelial cells, the permeability properties of Schlemm’s canal endothelial cells compared to vascular endothelial cells are quite different. In fact recent studies by our laboratory show that SCE cells cultured as monolayers on filters form a much less permeable barrier than two different types of endothelial cells (HUVECs and HMEC1) treated in the identical fashion (figure 2).

While both vascular endothelial cell types show a similar permeability, SCE cells were 60-90% less permeable. These data suggest that SCE cells utilize the same protein machinery to generate a tighter barrier than other endothelial cells.


The intercellular junctions of Schlemm’s canal endothelial cells have previously been shown to be calcium sensitive by Dr Stamer’s laboratory (Burke et al., 2004).

Thus, modulation of calcium dependent adhesion molecules, such as the cadherins by neutralizing antibodies or peptide antagonists constitutes a novel approach to glaucoma therapy (the focus of this patent).

Proof of concept for this idea was provided when elevation in intraocular pressure were shown to decrease the complexity of tight junctional strands between cells of the inner wall of Schlemm’s Canal (Ye et al, 1997) and open spaces between the cells (Epstein and Rohen, 1989).

The idea that complexity of cell-cell junctions correlate with permeability has been shown in ultrastructural analysis comparing arteries and veins (Simonescu et al., 1976) and known permeability of different vascular beds (Claude, 1973).

We conducted experiments to determine the functionality of recombinant human VE-cadherin utilizing the Biacore system to analyze protein-protein interactions (screen for potential interacting proteins). Recombinant VE-Cadherin (extracellular “binding” domain) cis-dimers were immobilized to the surface of a CM5 sensor chip using a standard amine chemistry protocol. Protein was diluted to 10 mg/ml in 10mM Na-Acetate buffer and 100 ml was consumed in this process; creating a surface density of 15,000 resonance units (RU) of material. As a positive control for the assay, we tested a monoclonal antibody raised against the extracellular domain of VE-cadherin (9H7) (Heimark and Hazelton, 1997). The antibody was prepared in the two different buffers (PBS containing calcium and PBS minus calcium) at a concentration of 67 µM. These two buffer conditions were used because anti-VE cadherin (9H7) was previously characterized by its enhanced binding activity in the absence of calcium. Upon injection (arrow) into the Biacore T100, anti-VE cadherin (9H7) was observed to specifically interact with the cadherin surface (Figure 3); showing a binding preference in the absence of calcium.

Preliminary kinetic analysis of anti-VE cadherin (9H7) binding was conducted. Typically kinetic analysis is performed using a minimum of 4 concentrations; however a single injection can yield an estimate of the kinetics and affinity of an interaction. Table 1 lists the binding parameters for the 9H7 monoclonal antibody to the extracellular domain of VE-cadherin in calcium and calcium free buffer.

TABLE 1: anti-VE cadherin 9H7 binding to Cadherin chimera surface

Buffer

Kon (1/mS)

Koff (1/S)

KD (nM)

Calcium

4.32E3

2.684E-4

620

Calcium free

4.61E3

3.365E-4

729

 

To develop peptides that could be used to compete with VE-cadherin homotypic adhesion and increase permeability across Schlemm’s canal in vivo, we designed a series of peptides that correspond to amino acids in extracellular domains one and two of human VE-cadherin and tested them in the Bicaore system with recombinant VE-cadherin immobilized to the sensor (similar to use with antibody). The binding of one VE-cadherin peptide #4748 (Ac-HLTAVIVDKDTGEN-OH) is shown in Figure 4. The peptide contains amino acids 119 to 132 of human VE-cadherin. There is a dose-related binding of 4748 in the absence of calcium to recombinant extracellular domain of VE-cadherin.

There is a significant alteration of the sensogram at 25 and 50 mM. The negative deflection of the sensogram in the presence of calcium suggests that dissociation of VE-cadherin trans-dimers had occurred.

Since VE-cadherin peptide 4748 showed the ability to bind to VE-cadherin, we tested its ability to increase permeability of SC endothelial cells grown in monolayer. VE-4748 was added to the luminal surface of the monolayer at a concentration of 100 mM and permeability was determined by analysis of the rate of passage of horseradish peroxidase from the upper luminal chamber to the bottom chamber at 37oC (the same as shown in figure 2).

Significantly, addition of 4748 to SCE monolayers increased permeability to the level observed for other endothelial monolayers. These effects were interpreted as being specific because other peptides failed to increase permeability like 4748. Such results are consistent with observations by Huang (Huang, 2000) stating that “the prospects (of peptide regulation of protein-protein interactions) appear bright and that they represent new paradigms of drug design and discovery”.

Taken together, our new data emphasize the novelty and feasibility of VE-cadherin as a target for the development of therapeutics that will increase the permeability of the conventional outflow pathway (decrease intraocular pressure) in people with glaucoma.

design by: www.idott.com